Category: Pro-poor strategies

Anti-poor, Cities, CITIES, TOWNS AND SETTLEMENTS, Construction services, Consumer-led development, Demographic-entrepreneurial relationships, ECONOMIC GROWTH/ANTI-GROWTH FACTORS, Enterprise regularities, Enterprise research, data and statistics, ENTERPRISE SECTORS, Entrepreneurial space, Local economic development (LED), Population size, Predictive capabilities, Pro-poor strategies, Trading services, Urban economy and growth

Pro-poor LED fails our cities, towns & the poor: Enterprises of the right kind generate city growth

Johannes Wessels
@johannesEOSA1

There is an intriguing symbiosis between cities and towns on the one hand and enterprises on the other. As the world population urbanise, so are business activities.

Physicist Geoffrey West in his “Scale:  The Universal Laws of Life, Growth and Death in Organisms, Cities and Companies” says based on city growth one can state precisely what will happen with the number of businesses in that city: a doubling of population does not require a doubling of grocery stores or filling stations, economies of scale kick in in a predictable manner. The reverse is also true.

Geoffrey West & Scale

Unfortunately, South Africa’s economic and enterprise development policies and strategies ignore these predictable realities. In addition, LED plans by municipalities in the main demonstrate a lack of understanding of what drives development.

Continue reading “Pro-poor LED fails our cities, towns & the poor: Enterprises of the right kind generate city growth” →
CITIES, TOWNS AND SETTLEMENTS, ECONOMIC POLICY AND STRATEGY, Enterprise dynamics, Enterprise regularities, Local economic development (LED), Population size, Pro-poor strategies, Spending power (wealth/poverty)

Is a pro-poor LED stance justified?

Nel and Rogerson (2016) reviewed Local Economic Development (LED) policy and practice in South Africa. They reported that results have been modest despite the significant support for nearly 20 years put into applied local economic development. They suggested that a potential over-focus on pro-poor local economic development at the expense of simultaneously working with the private sector on pro-market interventions, could be a stumbling block to the potential success of LED.

Mason (2018) stated that poverty is a multifaceted phenomenon and the condition of poverty often entails one or more of these realities: a lack of income (joblessness); a lack of preparedness (education); and a dependency on government services (welfare).

I asked if our research on enterprise dynamics that reported a wide range of regularities in the enterprise structures and dynamics of South African towns and municipalities (some of which have already been discussed here) could help to shed light on a question whether a pro-poor LED stance might be justified.

Continue reading “Is a pro-poor LED stance justified?” →